Photo by Richard Heinen on Unsplash
Documentation and records
The handover pack: what the next manager needs
A practical guide to the handover pack that lets a new building manager take over safely, with nothing lost in the gap between people.
The most dangerous moment in a building's compliance life is rarely an inspection or a refurbishment. It is the day one manager leaves and another arrives. Knowledge that lived in someone's head, in their inbox, or in a private folder on a laptop walks out of the door, and the new person spends their first months reconstructing what the building already knew. A good handover pack is what stops that loss. It is not a courtesy. For higher-risk buildings it is part of keeping the golden thread intact through a change of dutyholder.
What a handover pack is for
A handover pack exists so that a competent person who has never set foot in the building can take responsibility for it safely. That is a higher bar than "a folder of documents". It means the pack has to carry not just the records but the context: what is outstanding, what is unusual, and what would catch out someone who assumed the building was ordinary. A pile of PDFs satisfies the first; only a deliberate handover satisfies the second.
Under the Building Safety Act 2022, the dutyholder for an occupied higher-risk building is the Accountable Person, and where there are several, a Principal Accountable Person. When that role changes hands, the obligations do not pause. The new dutyholder is expected to hold the safety case and keep the building registered and compliant from day one, which is only possible if what they inherit is complete.
The core of the pack
Every handover pack should carry the same spine, whatever the building. The essentials are:
- Identity and structure. Address, registration details, ownership, the management structure, and who the responsible person and Accountable Person are.
- Current statutory documents. The live fire risk assessment, the latest EICR, lift examination records, asbestos register, water risk assessment, and any safety case report.
- Plans. Up-to-date floor plans, a single-page orientation plan, and the location of the secure information box where one is required.
- The compliance calendar. Every recurring obligation with its next due date, not just a list of what is done.
- Open items. Anything outstanding: remedial actions, contractor work in progress, disputes, and known defects.
The first four are records. The fifth is the one that gets lost, and it is the one that hurts.
The difference between documents and knowledge
A handover that transfers documents but not knowledge leaves the new manager technically equipped and practically blind. The pack should therefore include a short written briefing that a record alone cannot give: which contractors are reliable and which are not, where the building behaves oddly, which residents have particular needs, and what the last manager would warn their successor about over a coffee. None of this is statutory. All of it is what makes the first ninety days survivable. We have written separately about the first 90 days managing a new building, and a good handover pack is what makes those days a continuation rather than a cold start.
Where handover packs usually go wrong
The common failures are predictable. The pack is assembled in a rush on the last day, so it captures whatever was to hand rather than what was needed. It points to documents stored in systems the new manager has no access to. It records what is complete but is silent on what is outstanding, so the new manager inherits a clean-looking building with hidden liabilities. And it exists as a one-off snapshot that is already ageing the moment it is handed over.
The fix for all four is to stop treating handover as an event and start treating it as a state. If the building's records are continuously current, owned, and held in one place, the handover pack is not assembled. It already exists. The act of handing over becomes giving someone access rather than building a folder.
A handover that survives the gap
The test of a handover pack is whether the new manager can answer, in their first week, the questions an auditor or a regulator might ask. What is the next compliance deadline. When was the fire risk assessment last reviewed. What remedial work is outstanding and who is doing it. Where are the current plans. If the pack lets them answer without phoning their predecessor, it has done its job. If it does not, the gap between managers becomes a gap in the building's safety, and gaps like that are where incidents and enforcement both tend to find a home. The related discipline of records that survive a change of managing agent applies the same thinking at organisation scale.
Keeping the pack alive
The best handover pack is one nobody has to build. When the live records, the open actions and the plans all sit in the same place and stay current as a matter of routine, a change of manager is a change of login, not a reconstruction project. That is the standard worth aiming for, and it is far cheaper to maintain continuously than to recreate under time pressure on someone's last day.
SAMRISK is built so that a building's records, plans, open actions and compliance calendar stay in one current place, which means a handover is access rather than assembly. You can see how the pieces fit on the compliance calendar and building plans pages. The aim is simple: nothing the building knows should leave when a person does.
